CSE Risk Experts
Your specialists in risk analysis and risk management
Efficiently organized,
legally compliant documented.
Technical risk analyses are essential for the operation of your process plants. But they also consume resources, time, and patience.
CSE Risk Experts ensure streamlined processes, efficient moderation, and legally compliant documents. Over 200 customers across Europe rely on them.
Here’s what you can expect:
Risk analyses using established methods such as HAZOP, HAZID, LOPA, QRA, FMEA, What-If, etc.
Projects tailored exactly to your needs: online or in person, in blocks or as individual sessions, in German or English.
Scalable services ranging from individual plants to global standards for your locations.
CSE specialists with proven expertise in your type of plant.
Up to 30% time savings compared to in-house execution.*
Your contacts:
Dr.-Ing.
Natalie Schmidt
Managing Director
CSE-Engineering Services
Expert § 29b BlmSchG
mail send an email
phone +49 721 6699 4836
Let’s get to know each other.
Upcoming dates for you
Tuesday, June 16, 2026, 10:00 – 10:30
Thursday, June 18, 2026, 15:00 – 15:30
Tuesday, June 23, 2026, 10:00 – 10:30
Thursday, June 25, 2026, 15:00 – 15:30
Tuesday, June 30, 2026, 10:00 – 10:30
Thursday, July 02, 2026, 15:00 – 15:30
We can also come to you
For in-person appointments, please call us at +49 721 6699 4709.
Your request:
CSE Risk Analyses
HAZOP (Hazard and Operability Study)
Complex plants and processes are highly sensitive to seemingly minor operational disruptions. HAZOP studies help identify precisely these deviations and assess their potential consequences. A HAZOP is a systematic analysis of process deviations (e.g., “pressure,” “temperature,” “flow”) using combinations of key words (e.g., “more,” “less,” “none”). Operational disruptions can thus be identified easily and effectively through a structured analysis. For operational areas covered by the 12th Federal Immission Control Ordinance (12.BImSchV) in particular, the HAZOP analysis reflects the state of the art in safety engineering. Our experts facilitate your HAZOP workshops, contribute safety engineering expertise, structure the analysis using defined key words, and document all scenarios, causes, effects, and measures. This results in legally compliant documentation to identify and effectively address technical and organizational weaknesses.
HAZID (Hazard Identification Study)
In the early stages of a project, it is crucial to identify potential hazards before they become “embedded” in the planning and execution phases. Through HAZID workshops, we help you identify, structure, and prioritize risks as early as the concept and preliminary planning phases. Together with your team, we identify hazards, derive initial protective measures, and thereby establish a solid foundation for in-depth analyses such as HAZOP or LOPA.
LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis)
Once hazards have been identified, the question arises: Are the existing levels of protection sufficient to reduce the risk to an acceptable level? The LOPA method assesses whether the planned or existing barriers (e.g., technical protective functions, organizational measures, or alarm systems) are sufficient when considered as a whole. We conduct LOPA analyses for you, quantify or semi-quantify the risks, and assist you in deriving additional or optimized levels of protection.
FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis)
PProducts, plants and processes consist of a multitude of components and interfaces. Failures can occur in a wide variety of places. Using an FMEA, we systematically analyze potential failure modes, their causes and effects, and evaluate them based on probability of occurrence, severity, and detectability. This method is frequently used in the evaluation of mechanical engineering and in risk analysis for the CE marking of machinery. On this basis, we work with your team to identify critical vulnerabilities and develop measures to prevent failures proactively rather than having to correct them after the fact.
What-if-Analysis
A quick, practical assessment of risks is particularly important in the early stages of a project, for simple plant components, or when organizational changes are underway. A detailed HAZOP analysis is not always necessary for every component. The what-if analysis uses structured “what-if” questions to shed light on potential deviations from the target state and their consequences. We facilitate these analyses with your experts, document the identified scenarios, and derive pragmatic measures that can be easily integrated into ongoing operations.
AEA (Failure Mode Analysis)
Failure mode and effects analysis focuses on the consequences that the failure of individual components or functions has on the overall system. This method is highly effective for assessing the severity of these impacts. It is particularly well-suited for identifying critical elements in technical installations or system architectures. We support you in defining relevant failure scenarios, evaluating the impacts on safety and availability, and deriving priorities for design and organizational measures.
FTA (Fault Tree Analysis)
When it comes to understanding the causes of an undesirable operating condition in combination, fault tree analysis offers a structured, top-down approach. Starting from a defined event (e.g., equipment failure, safety function failure), logical relationships between the causes are modeled and, if desired, quantitatively assessed. This method is frequently used when assessing high-risk scenarios or investigating events that have already occurred. We develop fault trees for you, calculate failure probabilities, and identify where redundancies or additional protective measures are particularly effective.
QRA (Quantitative Risk Analysis)
In the oil, gas, and hydrogen industries, a purely qualitative assessment is often insufficient to meet complex safety requirements. Using quantitative risk assessments (QRA), we numerically determine probabilities of occurrence, extent of damage, and risk levels, and precisely align these with your acceptance criteria.
These probabilistic approaches are becoming increasingly important, particularly in densely populated Germany, as authorities and companies are increasingly demanding detailed risk assessments for natural gas infrastructure projects or the transition to hydrogen. As a well-founded alternative to purely deterministic methods, QRA enables the definition of spatially resolved safety concepts: This allows protective measures to be implemented precisely where the risk requires it. To this end, we combine internationally recognized methods with specific statistical data and regulatory requirements to present risks to management and regulatory authorities in a transparent and legally compliant manner.
CSE Risk Management
Development of company standards
For companies with multiple locations—and in some cases even across different countries—it is often challenging to ensure consistent quality, comparability, and expertise in risk management across all sites. When a risk analysis should be conducted, which methods are suitable for specific plant components, and the composition of the team—these are all questions that are not easy to answer for many types of facilities. The experts at CSE will help you develop your own understanding of risk management and establish a standard across the various teams at all locations. We are also happy to integrate such a standard directly into your existing safety management system.
Software selection
For individual plants that conduct risk analyses at irregular intervals, simple Office tools and templates are often sufficient to ensure proper documentation. However, such tools reach their limits when the process plant consists of many components, or they can hinder regular workflows due to unsuitable search and paste functions. For these cases, the industry offers a range of software solutions designed to perform risk analyses. Drawing on experience with approximately 15 different software programs, CSE can assist you in selecting a suitable software solution for conducting your risk analysis and implementing it across all your sites.
Moderation of interface analyses
Interface analyses between individual components are a major concern, and not just in the context of a company’s own CE marking. Even when operators purchase machines from a single manufacturer as a package unit, the question often arises as to whether additional safety technology is required to safeguard the facility. However, interfaces also exist on a large scale: multiple operators located within a chemical park often share site networks, which can create hazards for neighboring facilities. CSE supports you in facilitating and evaluating interfaces within your facility or chemical park.
Training & Coaching
CSE Academy
With the CSE Academy’s Applied Safety Premium seminar “Risk Management and HAZOP”, you can ensure that your employees gain a thorough understanding of the methodology and its practical application. Also available as in-house training.

Laws, Standards, Guidelines
Standards
- Machinery Regulation
- Pressure Equipment Directive
- Hazardous Substances Regulation
- BImSchG
- BetrSichV
- 12. BImSchV
- DIN 12100
- IEC 61882
- VDI 2180
- TRAS 110
- TRAS 120
- TRAS 410
- KAS-55
- KAS-60
Projects
Gas Storage
HAZOP-Analysis
- Objective: Update the risk analysis for facilities at risk of major accidents (every 5 years)
- Project scope: approx. 250 flowcharts
- Project duration: approximately 1 year, with weekly meetings
- Conducted: online | in person
- Evaluation: Entire facility, including all safety equipment
- Result: Approximately 200 recommendations for improving the safety concept
Fuel Storage
What-if analysis
- Objective: Conformity assessment (TRGS 509)
- Project scope: 3 flowcharts
- Project duration: 1.5 days
- Conducted: on-site
- Assessment: Overall tank configuration, loading and unloading points for tank trucks, tank cars, and ships
- Result: Upgrading the facility to meet current safety standards
Refrigeration System
FME Analysis
- Objective: To prepare a risk analysis for CE marking (DIN 12100)
- Project scope: 20 pages
- Project duration: 2 days
- Procedure: Review of the manufacturer’s risk analysis
- Additional: Facilitation of the interface analysis for the process plant in collaboration with the manufacturer and operator
- Result: Legally compliant documentation for manufacturers and operators
Multi-Purpose
HAZOP Analysis
- Objective: Preparation of documentation for facilities subject to major-accident hazards (TRAS 410)
- Project scope: 50 flowcharts
- Project duration: 1 year, in two-week cycles
- Conducted: online | in person
- Challenge: Evaluation of the multi-purpose reaction of approximately 60 components
- Result: Identification of potential runaway reactions in accordance with TRAS-410, as well as metrological analysis
An overview of the project workflow
Required documents:
The following information and documents are typically required to conduct risk analyses:
- Process Description
- R&I flowcharts or PDF drawings
- Safety Data Sheets for the substances handled
- Operating Conditions | Design Conditions
Optional:
- Previous risk assessment
- Explosion protection document or zone plan
- Experimental studies on the heat balance of a reaction (see also reaction calorimetry) or on the flammability or explosive behavior of substances (e.g., HAZOP)
- Site conditions of the facility (e.g., the facility’s surroundings and neighboring buildings)
For urgent cases, our Priority Service offers expedited processing of your project. Once you place your order, we begin analyzing your documents and project parameters the very same day. Within 24 hours, you will receive an initial assessment of the project scope, any gaps in the documentation, the projected timeline, and the required resources.
Based on this, we will coordinate the next steps with you and, depending on the scope of the project, implement it in such a way that it can be completed within the same week, if desired.
R&ID Flowchart Example: The Foundation for an Efficient Risk Analysis.
References:
The CSE Engineering team has project experience gained from a wide range of successfully completed risk analyses—from small individual facilities to multinational corporations.
CSE-Engineering provides experts in accordance with Section 29b of the Federal Immission Control Act (BImSchG) in the field of systematic risk analysis methods. These experts have been officially registered and have demonstrated their expertise, reliability, and independence during the registration process.
CSE Engineering also leads the EUGAH knowledge-sharing initiative, which aims to automate HAZOP studies using artificial intelligence. Through close collaboration between industry and research, the goal is to successfully implement new technologies into industrial practice.
*Based on experience gained from over 500 risk analyses.
Image source “Multi-Purpose”: Courtesy of Henkel AG & Co. KGaA



CSE-Engineering